Are you the publisher? Claim or contact us about this channel


Embed this content in your HTML

Search

Report adult content:

click to rate:

Account: (login)

More Channels


Showcase


Channel Catalog


Channel Description:

TOPSTORIES

older | 1 | .... | 990 | 991 | (Page 992) | 993 | 994 | .... | 1060 | newer

    0 0


    The family of 83-year-old Domingos Martins is grateful that he was found alive after an intense search since last week, but they are now puzzled over where he has been for the last five days.

    Martins, who has Alzheimer’s, was found by Toronto police on Wednesday around 10:21 a.m. in the area of Highway 400 and Highway 401, near Black Creek Dr.

    His grandson, John Martins, told the Star police found Domingos in a shaded area behind a gate and that he was lying behind a transport truck.

    Superintendent Ron Taverner said Martins was on the ground when officers from 12 Division arrived.

    “It appeared he had fallen and wasn’t able to get up,” said Taverner.

    But police and the family still don’t know how long Domingos was in that spot or how he managed to cope with the hot weather over the past few days.

    He was conscious and breathing when he was taken to hospital, but he is now in critical condition in the intensive care unit, Humber River Hospital told the Star.

    Domingos was last seen on July 28 around 4:30 p.m. in the Lawrence Ave. W. and Jane St. area.

    His family appealed to the public during his disappearance to help them find him.

    “It was a very stressful time for us. We were staying up for 22 hours a day looking for him,” said John.

    “When police found him it was such a sigh of relief.”

    John said Domingos was diagnosed with Alzheimer’s about a year ago, and this is the first time he’s wandered off.

    “We feel guilty because we feel like we could have done more to prevent this from happening.”

    Taverner said the search area expanded over the weekend after police they didn’t find him in the vicinity of his home. Hundreds of volunteers, including his family members, formed the search party.

    “A lot of credit goes to a lot of people who did what was needed to find this man,” said Taverner.

    John said the family still hasn’t gotten the chance to ask Domingos what happened over the last five days.


    Family breathes ‘sigh of relief’ after 83-year-old with Alzheimer’s disease found aliveFamily breathes ‘sigh of relief’ after 83-year-old with Alzheimer’s disease found alive

    0 0


    The last time Pearse Vujcic’s dog ran circles around the balcony of his East York apartment, it was because of a small earthquake. So when the 57-year-old observed the same behaviour Monday evening, he knew something must be amiss.

    That’s when Vujcic heard signs of distress coming from the apartment of his longtime neighbour and friend, Zlatan Cico.

    “I heard yelling and screaming that I heard only in war, and I knew somebody was dead,” Vujcic said.

    Police found Cico, 58, and his 6-year-old son, Simon, without vital signs in the building near Gamble and Broadview Aves. shortly after 7 p.m., after an apparent murder-suicide.

    Upon hearing the screams, Vujcic left his apartment and saw a woman he recognized as Cico’s wife in distress, screaming, “My son is inside. What will I do without my son?”

    The door to Cico’s apartment was open, and Vujcic entered to find the man who had been his friend and neighbour for 11 years dead, with a note on his chest.

    He also saw Simon there. Vujcic knew instantly, looking at him, that it was too late to help. Toronto police said the boy had suffered physical trauma.

    Diana Maslova, who lives on the floor above, said she saw Cico’s wife later, after the bodies were found, and she “looked like a zombie.”

    “At that point she didn’t talk or cry or react,” Maslova said. “Somebody tried to hug her and she didn’t even move. She was just looking straight ahead.

    “She looked like she was in shock.”

    Vujcic said that Simon Cico lived full-time with his mother, and visited his father regularly.

    Neighbours didn’t know much about the mother, who doesn’t live in the building, apart from occasionally seeing her in the elevator.

    Vujcic described Simon as a “happy kid.” Just a couple of weeks ago, Cico had taken him to see a film at the Hot Docs Cinema on Bloor St. Vujcic joked that the young kid probably wouldn’t like the documentary, but Simon said he had a good time.

    “My point is, until the last moment, they had a good time together,” Vujcic said.

    Maslova also said the father and son were in good spirits whenever she saw them.

    “They were always talking, laughing and looking happy,” she said.

    Vujcic said that he regrets having missed signs of depression or distress in his close friend.

    “All my life I will blame myself that I didn’t notice that he was suicidal,” Vujcic said. “I miss him dearly.”

    Police said they are not looking for any suspects, but wish to speak to anyone who has background information that may give them some “clarity” about what happened.

    “Based on what we have, we know who the suspect is: he’s the male involved in it,” Toronto police Sgt. Allyson Douglas-Cook said. “However, there’s still questions that … remain unanswered at this point.”

    Police are interested in speaking to friends, family or anyone who was in the area at the time of the incident. They are asking anyone with information to call 416-808-7400.

    A post-mortem was being carried out Tuesday to determine the cause of death.

    With files from Alexandra Jones and Alanna Rizza


    Man, 58, and boy, 6, dead in apparent murder-suicide in East York Man, 58, and boy, 6, dead in apparent murder-suicide in East YorkMan, 58, and boy, 6, dead in apparent murder-suicide in East York Man, 58, and boy, 6, dead in apparent murder-suicide in East York

    0 0


    Toronto’s bike share system is getting a major expansion that will stretch the network from east Etobicoke to Scarborough’s western border.

    Users of Bike Share Toronto and its distinctive black bicycles will get 70 new pick-up/drop-off stations this month, officials announced Wednesday.

    The locations, chosen for their proximity to subway stations and streetcar stops, will bring the total number of stations to 270. They will stretch from Marine Parade Dr. on the waterfront, just west of the Humber River, across the city to Victoria Park Ave. north of Bloor St.

    The City of Toronto and the federal government are each contributing $1.25 million toward 50 of the new stations, with the city kicking in an extra $1.5 million for the remainder.

    It’s a remarkable comeback for a system that launched as Montreal export BIXI in 2011 but struggled financially with a small downtown network until it was rebranded as Bike Share Toronto under control of city-owned Toronto Parking Authority.

    Last year the Ontario government contributed $4.9 million to double the network with 80 new stations and 800 new bikes.

    Expansion seems to have paid off. The system recorded its highest-ever daily ridership — 6,490 — on June 21 and has grown to 9,500 active members. They took more than 1.1 million trips in the past year and have pedaled more than 16.8 million kilometres since the service first launched.

    The system is meant to be an alternative to private bike use for short-haul trips and extensions to transit excursions. Riders use a credit card to unlock the bike and can return it to any station. People who buy $90 annual memberships can use a bike for up to 30 minutes without additional charges.

    The system also eliminates cyclists’ worries about bike theft, a common problem in Toronto.

    At the announcement, at a new station near Lansdowne subway station, Mayor John Tory said the new stations will help expand Torontonians’ transit options and, if fewer people drive, reduce “nightmarish” traffic congestion.

    Expanding to suburban parts of Toronto offers a new option to homeowners, some of whom multiple cars in the driveway, Tory said.

    “I believe that the bike share program represents part of the answer to the transit unfriendly development of yesteryear . . . Riding a shared bike to the transit stop may well represent the answer to getting some of those residents in some of those areas out of their cars and onto the transit system,” he said.

    Davenport MP Julie Dzerowicz, representing federal Infrastructure Minister Amarjeet Sohi, echoed that message, saying: “We really do need to shift people out of their cars and onto transit and onto bikes.”

    Bike share popularity seems to be part of an increased enthusiasm for cycling, driven at least in part by an increase in dedicated bike lanes.

    Daniela Patino of Cycle Toronto welcomed the new stations, especially around Bloor St., and said her group would like to see even more in Toronto’s east end.

    “People are starting to see that cycling is the best way to get from A to B for shorter trips,” Patino said.

    City cyclists might soon have another bike-share option. Dropbike, an app-based “dockless” service with self-locking bikes that can be unlocked via smartphone, launched recently at the University of Toronto’s St. George campus. The company hopes to expand to other parts of Toronto.

    With files from Betsy Powell


    Bike Share Toronto expanding by 70 stationsBike Share Toronto expanding by 70 stations

    0 0


    WASHINGTON —U.S. President Donald Trump is pushing forward with his promise of a harder line on legal immigration, endorsing a proposal to slash the number of immigrants admitted to the United States while favouring those with certain education levels and skills.

    Trump announced his support for such an overhaul of immigration law during an event Wednesday at the White House with conservative Republican Sens. Tom Cotton of Arkansas and David Perdue of Georgia.

    The changes proposed in their bill, called the RAISE Act, would be the “biggest change in 50 years” to the immigration system, Trump said, and reflect the administration’s “compassion for struggling American families that deserve an immigrant system that puts their needs first.”

    The bill faces dim prospects in Congress, where nearly all Democrats and a sizable number of Republicans oppose its key provisions. But it reflects a central promise of Trump’s campaign and the renewed emphasis the White House has made in recent weeks to appeal to the president’s core supporters.

    White House staff have been working closely with Cotton and Perdue for weeks on the legislation, which would restrict how the U.S. admits immigrants and move to what Trump has described as a “merit-based” system similar to that used in Australia and Canada.

    The proposal “ends chain migration,” Trump said, referring to the preference for uniting family members in the current immigration system. It would implement a points-based system for awarding lawful permanent residency, or green cards.

    Foreign applicants would receive a higher score if they “speak English,” can financially support themselves and have skills that “can contribute to our economy,” Trump said.

    Read more:

    Trump signs bill imposing sanctions on Russia as punishment for election meddling

    Trump says Boy Scouts head called to praise his speech, but group ‘unaware’ of ‘such call’

    Little by little, Senate Republicans are abandoning Donald Trump

    The proposal has been praised by groups that advocate reduced immigration, including NumbersUSA and the Federation of Immigration Reform.

    Immigration advocacy groups are opposed, as are many economists who say the nation, with an aging population and low fertility rate, should be encouraging an influx of younger workers to spur economic growth.

    The current U.S. immigration system favours uniting family members with relatives already in the country. It was built on the premise that any person, regardless of how much education or money they have, can come to the United States and create a productive life for themselves.

    Any changes along the lines of the proposed bill would require support from moderate Republican senators such as Sens. John McCain of Arizona and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, and many Senate Democrats oppose making partial changes to immigration law without creating a pathway to legal status for immigrants who arrived in the country illegally and put down roots.

    Trump repeatedly has said he doesn’t want to reduce the total number of immigrants admitted each year, yet the proposal by Cotton and Perdue would cut legal immigration by more than half.

    At the same time, Trump during his campaign called for returning the level of foreign-born Americans to their historic norm. The level is currently higher than at most periods in U.S. history. Immigration experts said at the time that Trump’s goal could only be achieved by sharply reducing legal immigration levels.

    Trump has also been reluctant to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, started by President Barack Obama, which provides work authorizations to immigrants brought to the U.S. illegally as children. Trump called the program “unconstitutional” during the presidential campaign, but also has expressed sympathy toward people who are in this country illegally through no fault of their own and were raised here.

    At a rally in Ohio last week, Trump praised Cotton and Perdue and said he was working with the senators to replace “today’s low-scale system, just a terrible system where anybody comes in.”

    “We want a merit-based system, one that protects our workers, our taxpayers, and one that protects our economy. We want it merit-based,” Trump said.


    Trump to support ‘merit-based’ immigration system that would cut number of U.S. migrants in halfTrump to support ‘merit-based’ immigration system that would cut number of U.S. migrants in half

    0 0


    The 38 recommendations delivered by the jury Wednesday at the inquest into the police shooting death of Michael MacIsaac focused heavily on better mental health training for officers.

    MacIsaac, 47, was killed by Const. Brian Taylor on an Ajax street on Dec. 2, 2013. Taylor said MacIsaac was advancing on him with a table leg.

    The Durham Regional Police officer was cleared of criminal wrongdoing by Ontario's police watchdog, the Special Investigations Unit.

    Related story:

    Family says testimony from three police officers at shooting inquest is inconsistent

    Among the recommendations:

    • Change the name of the “use of force model” used by police to “conflict resolution model,” among other suggested names, with a focus on verbal and non-verbal de-escalation.

    • Set aside an extra week solely for de-escalation training at the Ontario Police College.

    • Have designated mental health officers requalify for the designation every year.

    • Train officers to avoid shouting commands and focus on other communication techniques.

    • Include role playing with actors in police mental health training.

    • Facilitate “significant participation” from individuals with lived experiences of mental health and addictions issues in police training.

    “It has been harrowing at times to hear the evidence,” coroner Dr. David Evans said Wednesday. “We trust the family of Michael MacIsaac have more understanding of the circumstances surrounding Michael's death and that will help them with their loss.”


    MacIsaac inquest jury recommends more mental health training for policeMacIsaac inquest jury recommends more mental health training for police

    0 0


    OTTAWA—Changing social norms, immigration and economics are driving big changes in how Canadians live, with more same-sex couples, more lone-parent families, more one-person households and more young adults living with their parents.

    The latest release of data from the 2016 census paints a picture of home life in Canada – households, relationships and children – and the theme is diversity, said Doug Norris, senior vice-president and chief demographer at Environics Analytics.

    “We’re getting more and more diverse in terms of our family forms. Family forms that didn’t exist or weren’t recognized 15, 20 years ago are now increasing,” Norris said in an interview.

    “That traditional mom, mad, kids is certainly not increasing very much and declining maybe a bit,” he said.

    “There’s more and more variation across the country,” he said, highlighting increases in same-sex couples, stepfamilies and number of common-law relationships.

    The changing face of Canadian households was driven home Wednesday when Statistics Canada revealed 2016 census data examining families, households and marital status.

    There were 14.1 million private households in Canada in 2016 – 9.5 million (67.7 per cent) had at least a married or common-law couple, with or without children, and lone-parent families.

    For the first time, people living on their own was the most common type of household, accounting for almost 30 per cent of all households in 2016. That percentage has been steadily increasing since 1951, when it stood at just 7.4 per cent. More women (53.7 per cent) than men are living alone. An aging population as well as higher divorce and separation rates have led to more people living alone, said Jonathan Chagnon, a demographer with Statistics Canada.

    But better economic prospects, pensions and increased presence of women in the workforce are also behind the trend, meaning more people are economically independent.

    “There’s an improvement in the standard of living – 150 years ago there was no retirement pension so it was really difficult to live by yourself,” he said. “It can explain why today it’s possible to be in a one-person household.”

    Among seniors, about one-third of women were living alone in 2016, compared with 17.5 per cent of men. Yet the number of older women living alone has dropped, in part because of the increased life expectancy of their male partners.

    Norris said it’s not clear whether the rise of lone-occupant households might shake up political strategies, notably the favoured appeal to working families.

    “The living alone population is pretty diverse. Some are in their 20s, some coming out of a separation and divorce in mid-age and there’s the older population,” Norris said.

    “Some of those people who are living on their own are divorced, they have kids of their own . . . older people have grandchildren. The interest in families is a lot broader than people who find themselves in just the traditional family structure,” he said.

    At the other end of the household spectrum, multigenerational homes – with at least three generations under the same roof – are also on the rise, growing by 37.5 per cent since 2001. More than 2 million Canadians live in a multigenerational household, which are most common among immigrant populations and Indigenous peoples.

    Related stories:

    Canadians speaking more languages, census reveals

    Highlights from the 2016 census

    The number of couples without children is growing faster (up 7.2 per cent) than couples with children (up 2.3 per cent). As a result, the share of couples living with at least one child fell to 51 per cent in 2016, the lowest level ever. “Less couples living with children is partly due to the aging of the population. . . . There’s more and more baby boomers who have seen their children leave,” Chagnon said in an interview.

    Married couples comprise the majority of relationships in 2016 but common-law unions are becoming more common, making up 21 per cent of all couples, up from 6.3 per cent in 1981.

    Common-law unions are on the rise. Nunavut has the highest percentage in the country at 50 per cent, followed by Quebec at 40 per cent. Common-law unions make up 14 per cent of partnerships in Ontario, below the national average of 21 per cent.

    The census counted 72,880 same-sex couples in Canada – slightly more men than women – and one-third were married.

    Same-sex couples remain a very small percentage of all couples – just 0.9 per cent – but a fast-growing segment. In the last decade, the number of same-sex couples has increased by 60 per cent, compared with a 9 per cent increase in the number of opposite-sex couples. About 12 per cent of couples had children living with them.

    Half of all same-sex couples were living in four of the country’s largest urban areas: Toronto, Montreal, Vancouver and Ottawa-Gatineau.

    More and more, young adults are staying at home. More than one in three (34.7 per cent) young adults aged 20 to 34 were living with at least one adult in 2016, a share that has been rising since 2001 when it stood at 30.6 per cent.

    That number is highest in Ontario where 42 per cent of all young adults live with their parents, by the far the largest share of all provinces and territories and up 20 per cent over the last 15 years, Statistics Canada reports.

    Indeed, almost half all young adults in Toronto and Oshawa are living with their parents, potentially related to the high cost of housing across the Greater Toronto Area.

    Statistics Canada cites a number of potential factors for the trend, including the “temporary benefits in terms of logistical, emotional or financial support” for young people while still in school or job hunting.

    In Ontario, it says a “combination of economic realities, including the high cost of housing, and cultural norms that favour young adults living with their parents for longer” is behind the trend.

    Immigrants, especially those who are arrived as children, and those who are second-generation Canadians were more likely to live with a parent.

    While the trend has been called “boomerang” kids – children who return to the nest – separate research by Statistics Canada has found that the majority of young adults (69 per cent) in fact never left their parents’ homes.

    With more young adults living with mom and dad, fewer of them (41.9 per cent) are living a spouse, partner or child, a trend that has been steadily declining since 2001.

    Statistics Canada says similar trends are seen in other jurisdictions such as the United States (34 per cent) and the European Union (48 per cent).

    In 2016, of the 5.8 million children aged 14 and younger living in private households, 70 per cent were living with both of their biological or adoptive parents.

    Lone-parent families are the rise with more than 1 million children – about 20 per cent – living with a single parent. Of these, the vast majority of children (81.3 per cent) lived with their mother while 18.7 per cent were with their father. But over the last 15 years, the number of children living with a lone father has grown by 34.5 per cent, which Statistics Canada says is the result of changing attitudes and the acknowledgement of the role of fathers as well as a legal system that increasingly awards joint custody.

    One in 10 children – 567,270 – were living in a stepfamily. About 83,000 children were living without their biological or adoptive parents, either with their grandparents or other relatives.

    And the family situation can change over the course of a child’s life. While a child is less likely to experience the death of a parent – thanks to increases in life expectancy – the chances of a parental split has been on the rise. One in eight children younger than 1 were living in a one-parent family. But among older children, ages 10 to 14, the proportion of those in a one-parent family increases to one in four.

    Ontario, B.C. and Alberta have the highest percentage of so-called “intact” two-parent families. Nova Scotia has the highest percentage of children living with a lone parent.

    The census adds another chapter in the evolution of Canadian homes, dating from Confederation when large rural families had on average 5.6 people per household, a number that dropped to 2.4 by 2016. Indeed, the census itself has had to adapt to a changing society – same-sex couples were only counted starting in 2001 and step families in 2011.


    Canada has more same-sex couples, one-person households, census showsCanada has more same-sex couples, one-person households, census shows

    0 0


    WASHINGTON—Dealt a striking congressional rebuke, Donald Trump grudgingly signed what he called a “seriously flawed” package of sanctions against Russia on Wednesday, bowing for the moment to resistance from both parties to his push for warmer ties with Moscow.

    Trump signed the most significant piece of legislation of his presidency with no public event. And he coupled it with a written statement, resentful in tone, that accused Congress of overstepping its constitutional bounds, impeding his ability to negotiate with foreign countries and lacking any ability to strike deals.

    “Congress could not even negotiate a health care bill after seven years of talking,” he said scornfully of lawmakers’ recent failure to repeal “Obamacare” as he and other Republicans have promised for years. “As president, I can make far better deals with foreign countries than Congress.”

    Read the latest news on U.S. President Donald Trump

    Still, he said, “despite its problems, I am signing this bill for the sake of national unity.”

    It was powerful evidence of the roadblock Congress has erected to Trump’s efforts to reset relations with Russia at a time when federal investigators are probing Moscow’s interference in the U.S. presidential election and possible collusion by the Trump campaign.

    The legislation is aimed at penalizing Moscow for that interference and for its military aggression in Ukraine and Syria, where the Kremlin has backed President Bashar Assad.

    The law also imposes new financial sanctions against Iran and North Korea.

    Trump said the law will “punish and deter bad behaviour” by the governments of Iran and North Korea as well as enhance existing sanctions on Moscow. But he made no secret of his distaste for what the bill does to his ability to govern.

    “The bill remains seriously flawed — particularly because it encroaches on the executive branch’s authority to negotiate,” he said.

    Last week, the House overwhelmingly backed the bill, 419-3, and the Senate rapidly followed, 98-2. Those margins guaranteed that Congress would be able to beat back any veto attempt.

    Read more:

    Little by little, Senate Republicans are abandoning Donald Trump

    Russia urges U.S. to show ‘political will’ to fix ties as it cuts U.S. diplomatic staff

    GOP-led House set to pass Russia sanctions bill limiting Trump’s authority

    Trump has repeatedly cast doubt on the conclusions of U.S. intelligence agencies that Russia meddled in the 2016 campaign with the intention of tipping the election in his favour.

    He’s blasted the federal investigation as a “witch hunt.”

    Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., called the president’s concerns over the bill misplaced.

    “Vladimir Putin and his regime must pay a real price for attacking our democracy, violating human rights, occupying Crimea and destabilizing Ukraine,” McCain said. “Going forward, I hope the president will be as vocal about Russia’s aggressive behaviour as he was about his concerns with this legislation.”

    Trump’s talk of extending a hand of co-operation to Putin has been met by skeptical lawmakers looking to limit his leeway. The new measure targets Russia’s energy sector as part of legislation that prevents Trump from easing sanctions on Moscow without congressional approval.

    Russia wasn’t pleased. Putin responded on Sunday by announcing the U.S. would have to cut 755 of its embassy and consular staff in Russia. And Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev said in an emotional Facebook post Wednesday that “Trump’s administration has demonstrated total impotence by surrendering its executive authority to Congress in the most humiliating way.”

    On Wednesday, the Russian Foreign Ministry said Moscow is reserving the right to take further retaliatory measures in response to the sanctions bill.

    The statement contrasts with Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov’s earlier statement that “retaliatory measures already have been taken” — a reference to Moscow ordering the U.S. to steeply cut its number of diplomatic personnel in Russia and closing a U.S. recreational retreat.

    The Foreign Ministry emphasized that “we naturally reserve the right for other countermeasures.”

    It says the bill Trump signed reflects a “short-sighted and dangerous” attempt to cast Russia as an enemy and would erode global stability.

    The ministry added that “no threats or attempts to pressure Russia will force it to change its course or give up its national interests.”

    The congressional review section of the bill that Trump objects to was a key feature for many members of Congress.

    Trump will be required to send a report explaining why he wants to suspend or terminate a particular set of the sanctions on Russia. Lawmakers would then have 30 days to decide whether to allow that.

    Secretary of State Rex Tillerson echoed the president’s sentiments that the measure poses more diplomatic hindrances than solutions.

    “Neither the President nor I are very happy about that,” Tillerson said Tuesday. “We were clear that we didn’t think that was going to be helpful to our efforts, but that’s the decision they made.”

    Sean Kane, a former official with the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control, said the Obama administration had sought similar wiggle room when negotiating Iran sanctions with lawmakers.

    “These issues have come up before where an administration wants flexibility in place in a deal that would potentially lift sanctions, and Congress wants to tie the administration’s hands in some ways,” said Kane, now at the law firm Hughes Hubbard & Reed.

    Trump said that Congress had “included a number of clearly unconstitutional provisions.”

    Last winter, just before Trump was sworn in, a bipartisan group of senators unveiled a bill designed to go beyond the punishments already levied against Russia by the Obama administration and to demonstrate to Trump that forcefully responding to Moscow’s election interference wasn’t a partisan issue.

    Action on Russia sanctions didn’t really pick up until late May, when Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, threw his support behind the effort. The bill underwent revisions to avoid inadvertently undercutting U.S. firms or interfering with how European allies acquire energy.

    Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle celebrated the passage and signing.

    House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., said the bill sends a “powerful message to our adversaries that they will be held accountable for their actions.”

    But the House’s top Democrat said Trump’s statement calling the bill “seriously flawed” raises questions about whether his administration will follow the law. Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi said the Republican-led Congress must not allow the White House to “wriggle out of its duty to impose these sanctions for Russia’s brazen assault on our democracy.”


    Trump signs bill imposing sanctions on Russia as punishment for election meddlingTrump signs bill imposing sanctions on Russia as punishment for election meddling

    0 0


    Voters in the riding of York-Simcoe have a prime minister’s son in charge in Ottawa — and they could have another prime minister’s daughter as their MPP at Queen’s Park.

    Caroline Mulroney, 43, announced Wednesday she is seeking the Progressive Conservative nomination in the constituency north of Toronto on Sept. 10.

    Mulroney, whose father Brian Mulroney governed from 1984 until 1993, would give the Tories the kind of dynastic star power enjoyed by the federal Liberals led by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, son of Pierre Trudeau.

    “I believe that Ontario finds itself at a crossroads,” the Harvard- and New York University-educated lawyer and mother of four said in a statement.

    “This election is about offering a positive vision for Ontario — one that respects taxpayers’ money and delivers economic growth and well-paying jobs to the province,” she said.

    It is not clear why Mulroney, who was not made available to answer questions from the Star because she was too busy with local media interviews, is opting for provincial instead of federal politics.

    Born in Montreal, she grew up in Ottawa and served as the master of ceremonies at the May federal Conservative leadership convention in Toronto.

    In her statement and a YouTube video, Mulroney suggested pocketbook issues are what piqued her interest in becoming an MPP.

    “Making life more affordable for you and your family will guide everything I do at Queen’s Park. Unlike the current government, I will respect the people of Ontario, their hard-earned money, and the choices they make for their families,” she said.

    “As a working mother of four, I am concerned about the future of Ontario and I want to do my part to put it back on a path to prosperity. I’d be honoured to get to work with (PC Leader) Patrick Brown and the Ontario Progressive Conservative Party.”

    Currently a vice-president of the Toronto investment firm BloombergSen, Mulroney has worked in Canada and the United States and has a home in Georgina, which is in the riding of York-Simcoe.

    She is married to Andrew Lapham, the chairman of Blackstone Canada, a global investment firm, and the son of legendary American journalist Lewis Lapham of Harper’s Magazine and Lapham’s Quarterly fame.

    They have four children: a 12-year-old son, 11-year-old twins — a boy and a girl — and a 10-year-old daughter.

    Mulroney also chairs Shoebox Project for Shelters, a charity she co-founded with her three sisters-in-law, which has chapters in Toronto as well as other parts of Canada and the U.S., helping girls and women in shelters or at risk of becoming homeless.

    CBC first reported in early June that Mulroney, a centrist red Tory, was interested in running provincially.

    Her father, who is revered in Progressive Conservative circles despite past controversies, has given Brown political advice in recent years.

    The former prime minister — who delivered free trade and tax reform and was a key player in the fight against apartheid and acid rain — visited Queen’s Park in April 2016 to give the Tory caucus a pep talk and urged ornery MPPs to rally behind their leader.

    “Patrick, who’s an old friend of mine, asked me to come by and say hello to the caucus. We had a great meeting,” the elder Mulroney told the Star at the time.

    “I guess the only advice is obvious advice: If you’re the leader of the opposition it’s a very difficult job and you depend on the support and loyalty of your colleagues,” he said.

    “If that is provided, big things can happen. If it’s absent, there's going to be trouble. So I certainly urged them to do what happened to me when I was leader of the opposition. I got tremendous support from my caucus throughout my 10 years there and I hope the same thing is ongoing here.”

    Aside from her father, Mulroney has some influential supporters, including retiring York-Simcoe MPP Julia Munro, the longest serving female MPP in Ontario history, and current York-Simcoe MP Peter Van Loan.

    “She is a smart business leader with a knack for building consensus and getting results,” said Munro.

    Van Loan added that “Caroline is a great listener, she cares, and she wants to build a better future.”

    John Baird, a former federal and provincial cabinet minister, said Mulroney is “smart, well-educated, experienced, and ready to govern.”

    “It’s a coup for York-Simcoe and for Patrick Brown to recruit this kind of talent to Ontario politics,” said Baird, Canada’s foreign affairs minister until retiring in 2015.

    While Brown is ostensibly neutral in nomination contests — after a spate of problems surrounding disputed races — he expressed delight on Twitter at her candidacy.

    “I am thrilled to see such exceptional individuals like @C_Mulroney step up to seek a nomination for the @OntarioPCParty,” he tweeted.

    So far no other candidates have entered to run in York-Simcoe PC.


    Caroline Mulroney to seek Tory nomination in York-SimcoeCaroline Mulroney to seek Tory nomination in York-Simcoe

    0 0


    Trying to find an apartment in Toronto is a lot like online dating, only more demoralizing.

    Ask Kin Lau. Normally, landlords would be swiping right on him. He’s got a perfect credit score and a good job. But last week he drove 40 minutes to check out a one-bedroom — only to discover another suitor had snapped it up first.

    “Do people just not go to see the place before renting?” said Lau, a 25-year-old accountant.

    He just wants an apartment viewing. Is that too much to ask?

    Read more:

    Tenants at two west-end condos see rent double

    Average rent in Toronto passes $2,000 a month, report finds

    Short-term rental rules are on the right track: Editorial

    Who has the right to thrive in Toronto?: Micallef

    Renting in Toronto is the hardest it’s ever been. Home prices have doubled since 2008, so buying is out of reach for many people. That’s pushed Toronto rents to record highs, approaching those in Brooklyn and London. Potential tenants are so desperate they’re driving the streets looking for rentals and creating web profiles, similar to dating bios, to attract landlords. And prices are likely to keep rising given new laws that builders say discourage construction.

    “I can’t take clients with mediocre credit anymore, because landlords don’t even look at them,” said Conrad Rygier, a broker at Keller Williams Realty Inc. “I’ve seen a lot of frustration. Downtown is just absolute craziness.”

    Investors, lenders and Canadians looking for places to live are wondering how much longer the home-price boom can last. Although values have fallen 17 per cent since March, compared with a 3-per-cent gain in the same period last year, the average price of a detached home in Toronto is still near a record at $1.39 million.

    Rental supply is down to two weeks, meaning it would take that long to rent everything in town, and average rents have hit an all-time high.

    Toronto mostly has three types of rental properties: privately owned condominium suites, rental buildings with a central landlord, and space in a private home. Supplies of all three are squeezed.

    There are 1,125 condominium units available for rent in the city of 6.2 million people, down 13 per cent from last year, according to second-quarter data from Urbanation Inc. It’s also a record low for the period in Toronto.

    Rents jumped 11 per cent in the last year, blowing past the $2,000-a-month threshold for the first time, to $2,073 (about $1,644 U.S.), and nearing Brooklyn-level prices. In the Crown Heights section of the New York City borough, landlords ask an average $2,089 (U.S.) for a one-bedroom, according to June data from Brooklyn brokerage MNS Brands Inc. In greater London, average rent for new units in May fell to £1,502 ($1,960 U.S.), according to HomeLet.

    For newer rental-only towers, the vacancy rate reached a low of 0.1 per cent in the second quarter. In April the province of Ontario introduced the most sweeping rental rules in a quarter century. They cap rent increases at 2.5 per cent and extend rent controls to apartments built after 1991, which builders say will constrict new construction. It will likely keep renters climbing over one another to get a date with a landlord. Lau, the accountant, said he had four landlords cancel on him in two days.

    As for basement apartments and other unofficial listings, a segment of the market not actively tracked, good luck.

    Horror stories abound. Stephanie and Stephane Leonard spent more than a month checking online listings and cruising the city streets in their silver Audi, hunting for “For Lease” signs in house windows. In desperation, they posted an advertisement online that reads like a dating profile: charming, dependable and mature. Seeking: a one-bedroom rental. They joined dozens of others posting similar online ads.

    “It got to the point where I would monitor Kijiji for properties as soon as they popped up, and even then we couldn’t always get a showing,” said Stephanie Leonard, a 47-year-old training-manual writer, referring to the popular classifieds website. “I’ve moved around a lot in my life, and this is the hardest time I’ve ever had finding a place.”

    The Leonards ended up renting one floor of a house in Mimico, an emerging neighbourhood along the water about a 30-minute drive from Toronto, with two other tenants living on the other floors. It wasn’t a perfect match, but it works for now.

    Others aren’t so lucky. Dayna and Theo Block have to move to the city by Sept. 7, when Theo starts classes at the University of Toronto, joining the 100,000 other people migrating to the city each year. Their online ad, with a photo of the pair in a meadow by a wood fence, describes the 21-year-olds as a young, polite couple seeking to spend no more than C$825 a month. They’re getting more emails from scam artists asking for money than from landlords.

    “I want to tell people, ‘You don’t understand. We just need a place to live. The bare minimum,’” Dayna Block said by phone from their basement apartment in the western province of Alberta, Canada’s oil-producing region. The couple have even offered to pay rent for August despite not living in the city.

    Landlords are ecstatic at their good fortune. Jeff Medley listed his downtown Toronto “nothing special” 600-square-foot (56-square-meter) condo on a Wednesday. On Thursday, the winner of a bidding war agreed to pay C$1,850 a month for the place he’d offered for C$1,800.

    “Each time I’ve rented it, I’ve got more,” Medley said. “Nothing has changed about the unit.”

    Unless there’s an influx of supply or a slowing of demand, the market will only become more unhinged, said Rygier, the Keller Williams broker.

    “I was going to say, ‘If it’s a reasonably priced suite,’” he said. “But that’s an oxymoron these days.”


    As Toronto rents near Brooklyn-level prices, tenants grow desperateAs Toronto rents near Brooklyn-level prices, tenants grow desperate

    0 0


    Bail conditions have been reduced for a Toronto police officer and his brother, accused of beating Black teenager Dafonte Miller with a metal pipe in Whitby on Dec. 28.

    Const. Michael Theriault, 25, and Christian Theriault, 21, will now be able to consume alcohol, leave their homes at night and leave the province of Ontario while awaiting trial, a judge ruled Wednesday.

    The brothers were arrested two weeks ago and charged by Ontario’s Special Investigations Unit with aggravated assault, assault with a weapon, and public mischief in connection with an incident that left Miller with several broken bones and an eye so badly damaged it will have to be removed.

    Read more:

    Toronto police officer, brother accused of misleading investigators in Dafonte Miller case

    If Toronto police are serious about restoring our faith they need to root out the bad-apple cops: Keenan

    The Theriaults — whose father John Theriault is a longtime Toronto police detective currently assigned to the professional standards unit — were originally released on bail with the conditions that they refrain from contacting Miller, his family, Durham police officers who investigated the incident and other individuals relevant to the case.

    The Theriault brothers were also banned from having firearms, and ordered not to leave the province, not to consume alcohol and not to leave their homes between the hours of 10 p.m. and 6 a.m. unless they have special permission from their employers.

    Defence lawyers appeared in court Friday to have the Theriaults’ bail conditions changed. On Wednesday a judge decided that the brothers would be allowed to leave the house at night, to leave the province, and to drink alcohol.

    All information shared with the court during the bail process, except for the judge’s decision, is subject to a publication ban.

    It is not uncommon for courts to change bail conditions, particularly if the original restrictions are considered to be overly harsh, said Toronto defence lawyer Daniel Brown, who is not involved in the Theriault case and spoke to the Star about criminal cases in general.

    “You want to make sure the bail conditions reflect the dangers posed (by the accused),” said Brown.

    “It would be inappropriate to bar someone from consuming alcohol (if) alcohol played no role in the offence, but if there were allegations that alcohol was consumed and may have been a contributing factor in the assault you would certainly expect to see some sort of limitations or prohibitions on the consumption of alcohol.”

    Miller’s lawyer, Julian Falconer, has alleged in interviews that the Theriaults had been drinking at the time of the Dec. 28 incident.

    Falconer has provided an account of what allegedly happened in the early morning hours of Dec. 28, none of which has yet been tested in court.

    Miller and his friends were walking down a residential Whitby street shortly before 3 a.m., when they were confronted by the brothers, who had been sitting in the garage of their family home nearby, Falconer said.

    Michael Theriault, who was off-duty at the time, identified himself as a police officer and asked what the young men were doing, Falconer alleged. The Theriaults chased Miller and his friends and caught up with Miller, punching him, kicking him and beating him with a metal pipe, the lawyer said.

    Miller called 911 as the attack continued, Falconer has said. The call history from Miller’s phone, captured in a photo provided to the Star and other outlets, shows a call to 911 at 2:52 a.m., which lasted just over a minute.

    According to Falconer, Michael Theriault grabbed the phone and told the operator he was a police officer and had made an arrest. Falconer told the Star he has heard the 911 recording, which has not been released publicly.

    Durham police arrived at the scene and charged Miller with theft under $5,000, assault with a weapon and possession of a small amount of marijuana. Those charges were withdrawn by the Crown in May, before going to trial.

    The Theriaults’ mischief charges refer to allegations that they misled investigators, according to court documents.

    Neither Toronto police nor Durham police notified the SIU, the body called in to investigate cases of death, serious injury or alleged sexual assault involving police. It was not until Falconer contacted the police watchdog in April that it began an investigation.

    The case is scheduled to return to court on Aug. 10.


    Bail conditions relaxed for cop and brother accused in Dafonte Miller assaultBail conditions relaxed for cop and brother accused in Dafonte Miller assaultBail conditions relaxed for cop and brother accused in Dafonte Miller assaultBail conditions relaxed for cop and brother accused in Dafonte Miller assault

    0 0


    After at least six hot days and sweaty nights, the air conditioning at Old York Tower seniors’ home on The Esplanade is back on.

    On Wednesday afternoon before the air conditioning had been restored Dorothy Creaser, 83, sat in her apartment with blinds drawn, a fan blowing hot air around the near-dark living room.

    Wednesday’s forecast read 28 degrees at 2:30 p.m.

    Though building personnel who identified herself as Rose, said the AC had been off for six days, Creaser says she was without air conditioning for 10 consecutive days.

    There is one person who lives in the building who is 102, Creaser said.

    “I feel (management) has jeopardized the health and safety in the building,” said Creaser, who has lived in the building for 20 years. “I think they should all be changed.”

    Creaser uses a wheelchair and grapples with multiple medical conditions — she is a heart patient, she said. Around her neck dangled a lifeline device.

    “I wear an alert because of health issues, and last night I was really tempted to press this thing,” she said before the air conditioning was activated. “I’m a diabetic, too, so my feet are swelling in my own apartment. It’s the heat, definitely. I woke up in the middle of the night and the bottom sheet and pillow were wet — and I mean wet.”

    The biggest concern is the lack of communication from the board of directors and the property management firm, said Creaser. The Star made several attempts to reach the president of the board, but he failed to comment; Affordable Property Management Inc. oversees the non-profit residence and also did not respond to requests for comment.

    There was a notice posted in an elevator two days after the air conditioning broke, Creaser said, which indicated the problem was being addressed.

    “The latest notice said the part is en route from the U.S.,” said Creaser. “I guess they think we’re all senile. They talk to us like we’re 5 (years-old).”

    Outside the building Hernando Perez, who’s lived in the building for seven years was sitting on a bench near the entranceway.

    “It’s too hot,” he said.

    Another resident said many seniors are being picked up by family and taken someplace cool.

    Heather Anderson, 78, had been searching for an AC unit for her window at Canadian Tire earlier in the day.

    “I have looked into a couple of portables,” she said. “I’m thinking it might be a good investment if they don’t put a new system in here. They are trying to fix it, but 20 years is a long time for the same system to run, and we believe it’s kaput.”


    Residents of downtown seniors home say AC was off for 10 daysResidents of downtown seniors home say AC was off for 10 days

    0 0


    The Blue Jays have clearly thrown in the towel for this season. Already thin in starting pitching, with Aaron Sanchez battling blister problems, Jays general manager Ross Atkins traded left-hander Francisco Liriano to the Astros for a solid outfield prospect and veteran outfielder Nori Aoki. Then he sent key setup man Joe Smith to Cleveland for prospects.

    We should get a sense of their direction with their payroll and roster decisions. Could president Mark Shapiro and Atkins be open to dealing away the final year of Josh Donaldson before he hits free agency and still intend or pretend to contend? How much will the Jays have available for off-season free agents?

    The Payroll

    The Jays’ opening day payroll for 2017 was $163.4 million (all figures in U.S. dollars), according to the respected website Cot’s Baseball Contracts. That was the highest in the history of the franchise.

    The Jays will be divesting themselves of $55.4 million in expiring free-agent contracts, led by Jose Bautista’s mutual option that the club will surely decline with a half-million dollar buyout. Bautista earned $18.5 million in 2017. Other free agents include Marco Estrada ($14M), J.P. Howell ($3M), Darwin Barney ($2.89M), Chris Coghlan ($3M) and Miguel Montero ($14M).

    There are seven returning players in 2018 with guaranteed contracts totalling $75.9 million. That list includes Russ Martin and Troy Tulowitzki at $20 million each, J.A. Happ ($13M), Kendrys Morales ($11M), Steve Pearce ($6.25M), Justin Smoak ($4.125M), and Cuban prospect Lourdes Gurriel ($1M), who has a guaranteed, major-league, six-year deal.

    A record nine Blue Jays will be eligible for salary arbitration next February, including Donaldson, starters Marcus Stroman and Aaron Sanchez, closer Roberto Osuna and centre fielder Kevin Pillar. The Jays will likely either trade or non-tender the contracts of Ezequiel Carrera and Aoki.

    If the Jays do not trade Donaldson and the expected numbers are settled upon in arbitration, that group of seven will earn approximately $50 million, giving the Jays 14 players at $125.9 million. Assuming the Jays plan on entering 2018 with the same payroll they started 2017 with, that leaves about $37.5 million for 11 more controllable players or potential free-agent signings. That provides flexibility and the ability to make some off-season additions.

    If Shapiro and Atkins chose to fill those remaining spots with internal options, pre-arbitration guys with major-league experience, they could do it with the likes of Dominic Leone, Joe Biagini, Ryan Tepera, Anthony Alford, Danny Barnes, Luke Maile, Rob Refsnyder, Dalton Pompey and Mike Bolsinger. That mix would combine to cost a mere $8.5-million, leaving the Jays around $29 million to spend on free-agency — and that’s with the Jays keeping Donaldson.

    The Donaldson dilemma

    The Blue Jays have Donaldson for one more year. He is one of the five best third basemen in baseball, but will join the Orioles’ Manny Machado and Washington outfielder Bryce Harper on the huge free-agent market following the 2018 season.

    If the Jays keep Donaldson, they will still have three major holes to fill — two reliable starting pitchers and one hard-hitting corner outfielder. They could hang onto Donaldson for an arbitration salary of about $23 million, but they would lose him after next year because they will never be willing to give him a five-year deal of close to $30 million annually. Not for a 33-year-old Bringer of Rain who has just had a 2017 season of pain.

    A trade this off-season could fill one of their immediate needs at the major-league level, while adding two or three top prospects. There are at least eight major-league teams that have the need and the financial resources to target the third baseman. A healthy Donaldson is very attractive for a team that could also sign him long term.

    The 2018 outlook

    If second baseman Devon Travis, who has yet to play a full major-league season, returns from his knee troubles and contributes, if Sanchez is over his blister problems, if Gurriel is ready to play in the majors, and if the Jays roll the dice and trade Donaldson, they just might contend.

    They would need to get a solid starting pitcher in the package for Donaldson, and use the payroll space to trade for another starter, plus an outfielder. It’s in the outfield where the Jays need to become more athletic.

    Even if they do keep Donaldson for his farewell season, they will have payroll available to fill some of their needs, but ownership knows that fans at the ballpark and viewers across the country will not put up with reduced payroll and a rebuild. The people have put the Jays in a position where they must build a contender.


    Blue Jays have payroll to contend in ’18, if they so choose: GriffinBlue Jays have payroll to contend in ’18, if they so choose: Griffin

    0 0


    LONDON—Canadian sprinter Andre De Grasse will miss the upcoming world championships due to a hamstring injury.

    The injury is a big blow to the Canadian team who was relying on De Grasse for medals at the worlds. He was a medal threat in both the 100 and 200 metres and also served as the anchor on Canada’s 4x100 relay team.

    The 22-year-old from Markham, Ont., was due to race against Usain Bolt in the 100 metre final at London Olympic Stadium. Bolt, an 11-time world champion, plans to retire after the race. De Grasse was supposed to open the worlds with the 100 heats on Friday before the final on Saturday.

    De Grasse has had a strong season in the Diamond League and was atop the standings in both the 100 and 200 events.

    De Grasse is a three-time Olympic medallist and two-time world medallist.

    Read more:

    Usain Bolt has one word for De Grasse and doubters: unbeatable

    How the De Grasse effect has Canadians watching track and field again


    Andre De Grasse to miss world championships with an injuryAndre De Grasse to miss world championships with an injury

    0 0


    TAUNTON, MASS.—A young woman who as a teenager encouraged her suicidal boyfriend to kill himself in dozens of text messages and told him to “get back in” a truck filled with toxic gas was sentenced Thursday to 15 months in jail for involuntary manslaughter.

    Michelle Carter was convicted in June by a judge who said her final instruction to Conrad Roy III caused his death. Carter was 17 when the 18-year-old Roy was found dead of carbon monoxide poisoning in July 2014.

    Juvenile Court Judge Lawrence Moniz gave Carter, now 20, a 2 ½-year jail sentence but said she had to serve only 15 months of that. He also sentenced her to five years of probation. He granted a defence motion that will keep Carter out of jail until her appeals in state courts are exhausted.

    The judge called the case, which has garnered international attention, “a tragedy for two families.”

    Carter’s lawyer, Joseph Cataldo, asked the judge to spare her any jail time and instead give her five years of probation and require her to receive mental health counselling. He said she was struggling with mental health issues — bulimia, anorexia and depression — during the time she urged Roy to kill himself.

    “Miss Carter will have to live with the consequences of this for the rest of her life,” Cataldo said. “This was a horrible circumstance that she completely regrets.”

    Prosecutor Maryclare Flynn called probation “just not reasonable punishment” for Carter’s role in Roy’s death. She asked the judge to send Carter to state prison for seven to 12 years.

    Read more:‘Just do it babe’: The harrowing messages the accused sent her boyfriend hours before his suicide

    Flynn said Carter “undertook a deliberate, well-thought-out campaign” to cause Roy’s death in a “quest for attention” and sympathy from her friends. She said after Roy’s death, Carter put on a charade as “the grieving girlfriend” for Roy’s family and friends, even though she had repeatedly pressured him to act on his suicidal thoughts.

    Flynn said Carter could have stopped Roy because the two teenagers were on the phone together as Roy succumbed to carbon monoxide inside his truck.

    “All she had to do was say, ‘Get out of the car,’ ‘Get out of the truck,’ and none of us would be here right now,” Flynn said.

    In dozens of text messages, Carter had urged Roy to follow through on his talk of taking his own life.

    “The time is right and you are ready ... just do it babe,” Carter wrote in a text the day he killed himself.

    The sensational trial was closely watched on social media, in part because of the insistent tone of Carter’s text messages.

    “You can’t think about it. You just have to do it,” Carter wrote in one text. “You said you were gonna do it. Like I don’t get why you aren’t.”

    Cataldo argued Roy was determined to kill himself and nothing Carter did could change that. He said Carter initially tried to talk Roy out of it and urged him to get professional help but eventually went along with his plan. He also argued Carter’s words amounted to free speech protected by the First Amendment.

    In convicting Carter, the judge focused his ruling on Carter telling Roy to “get back in” after he climbed out of his truck as it was filling with carbon monoxide and told her he was afraid. The judge said those words constituted “wanton and reckless conduct” under the manslaughter statute.

    Roy’s relatives told the court they were devastated by his death. His father, Conrad Roy Jr., said it inflicted the “worst emotional pain” he has ever experienced.

    “I am heartbroken,” he said.

    A teenage sister, Camden Roy, recalled her 13 years with her older brother and said she’s “haunted” by the realization she’ll never see him wed or be an aunt to his children.

    Carter and Roy met in Florida in 2012 while both were on vacation with their families. After that, they only met in person a handful of times. Their relationship consisted mainly of texting.

    Cataldo said he’s confident Carter eventually will be vindicated. He said his appeal will be based on several grounds, including his argument Carter’s text messages and conversations with Roy amounted to free speech protected by the Constitution. He said he will also argue Carter didn’t break any laws because Massachusetts doesn’t have a law against assisting or encouraging suicide.


    0 0


    The real estate industry is downplaying a third consecutive month-to-month decline in Toronto-area home prices that saw the average cost of a home drop $173,000 between April and July — from $919,449 to $746,216.

    Prices were still up 5 per cent year over year, from $710,471 in July 2016. The numbers, released by the Toronto Real Estate Board (TREB) on Thursday, are averaged across all housing types.

    It's the kind of annual mid-single digit increase that indicates a return to healthy market conditions following months of record price escalation, according to the industry.

    There were 5 per cent more new listings on the market compared to the same period last year, but a dramatic 40.4 per cent drop in the number of home sales.

    The short-term price decline could make some owners "a little tense" if they are thinking about selling, said Christopher Alexander, regional director at Re/MAX Integra.

    But, he said, homeowners need to remember that, "Last year was a record year across the board."

    "Yes, sales are way down (but) prices have only fallen 5 per cent from June to July, which is exactly what we had last year, and listing inventory is only up 5 per cent. So I don't see a flood of extra inventory to distract buyers from making quick decisions," said Alexander.

    He echoed TREB's caution that summer statistics aren't the most accurate market indicators.

    "We're now back to a normal summer,” said Oakville agent Tracy Nursall of Sage Real Estate. “Normal summer means the volume of sales go down. We had rainy weather, everybody waited — now everybody's at the cottage and September's going to be very busy."

    But for buyers looking for more space, this is the move-up market they've been waiting for, she said.

    "If you lose 5 per cent on your townhouse and you're going into a detached that has also lost 5 per cent, the dollar difference is significant. It's just that people are still clinging like a spurned lover to the old March market," said Nursall, referring to the first-quarter peak when home prices averaged $916,767.

    TREB reported the biggest decline in sales volumes last month in higher-priced, single-family homes, which were down 47.4 per cent year over year, compared to a 30 per cent drop in the condo sales.

    Detached house prices rose 4.9 per cent region-wide in July and condo prices were up 23.2 per cent.

    Prices are holding as volumes plummet because "buyers are perched on the sidelines holding their breath wondering if home values will re-set lower," said Royal LePage CEO Phil Soper. "But in a strong economy like this, my expectation is that sellers will continue to hold firm and not let their properties go at a discount to market value."

    Housing supply will continue to contribute to price pressure in the Toronto area, he said. Even though it appears there's an over-supply at the moment, "we'll be back to talking about housing shortages by next spring"

    "I hope that this short-term market correction doesn't encourage policy makers to ignore the hard work that must begin on a long-term housing strategy for the GTA," added Soper.

    Housing Minister Peter Milczyn said that the July TREB numbers are proof the government's Fair Housing Plan, including the 15-per cent foreign buyers tax, is working.

    "We recognized that housing affordability was a real and growing concern for many people. The goal of the plan was to make buying and renting a home more affordable for people across the province," he said in a statement.

    "(They show) that more supply is becoming available and that there has been a more moderate pace of annual price growth," he said.

    Files by Kristin Rushowy


    0 0


    WASHINGTON—Trade with Canada is so fair and balanced, U.S. President Donald Trump told his Mexican counterpart in January, that “we do not even think about them.”

    Trump made the remarks in a phone call with Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto on Jan. 27, a week after his inauguration.

    A transcript of the call was obtained by the Washington Post and published on Thursday, just under two weeks before the beginning of negotiations on revisions to the North American Free Trade Agreement.

    Read more

    ‘Putin was a pleasant call. This is ridiculous’: Full transcripts of Trump’s calls with Mexico and Australia

    Stop saying ‘Mexico is not going to pay for the wall,’ Trump urges Mexican president in leaked transcript

    “Well, Canada is no problem — do not worry about Canada, do not even think about them,” Trump said after Pena Nieto made reference to the “three countries” that are part of NAFTA. “That is a separate thing and they are fine and we have had a very fair relationship with Canada. It has been much more balanced and much more fair. So we do not have to worry about Canada, we do not even think about them.”

    Those private words were in line with Trump’s public words during Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s visit to Washington three weeks later, when Trump called the trade relationship with Canada “very outstanding.” But they went even further, suggesting Trump’s frequent campaign complaints about NAFTA were solely focused on Mexico.

    Trump, perhaps seeking negotiating leverage, has since started talking tougher about Canada. In April, he railed against Canada over an arcane dairy dispute and slapped tariffs on Canadian softwood lumber.

    “People don’t realize Canada’s been very rough on the United States. Everyone thinks of Canada being wonderful and civil,” he said in April. “I love Canada. But they’ve outsmarted our politicians for many years, and you people understand that.”

    Dan Ujczo, an Ohio-based trade lawyer focused on Canada-U.S. issues, said Trump talking up Canada to the president of Mexico was in line with a “lifelong negotiating tactic.”

    “We have witnessed that this is a president whose modus operandi is to pit parties against each other in any negotiation, whether on staff, his Cabinet, or members of Congress,” Ujczo said. “This could be relevant on areas where Canada’s and Mexico’s interests diverge, such as in agriculture.”

    Canada did not come up again in the January call. In the most noteworthy portion, Trump pleaded with Pena Nieto to stop publicly saying that Mexico would not pay for Trump’s border wall — and promised Pena Nieto that the funding would “come out in the wash” and “work out in the formula somehow.”

    Trump, asking Pena Nieto to help fight the “tough hombres” behind Mexico’s drug trade, also declared the state of New Hampshire a “drug-infested den.”

    NAFTA talks begin in Washington on Aug. 16. Trump’s administration has issued a lengthy wish list of desired changes that would affect Canada on issues from telecommunications to online shopping.


    0 0


    OTTAWA—Environment Minister Catherine McKenna is facing legal action from several environmental groups who accuse the government of dragging its heels on investigating Volkswagen for duping Canadians with diesel engines.

    Volkswagen pleaded guilty in the U.S. in March after software was found in certain diesel vehicles that made it appear as though the cars were producing fewer emissions than they really were.

    In fact, under normal conditions, the cars emitted 35 times Canada’s legal limit on nitrogen oxides, which have adverse effects on human health and contribute to climate change.

    Read more:

    Volkswagen Canada resumes selling diesel cars at centre of emissions-testing scandal

    Federal government must prosecute Volkswagen for cheating, environment groups say

    Ottawa must stop the stalling on Volkswagen probe: Editorial

    About 105,000 of the rigged vehicles were sold in Canada and Volkswagen has a court-certified settlement program underway to buy back the cars and compensate Canadians who owned or leased them.

    A statement from McKenna says her department is investigating and will act if necessary, but that investigation is nearly two years old and two groups, Environmental Defence and the Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment, are tired of waiting.

    Tim Gray, executive director of Environmental Defence, said his organization heard informally from the government that almost two years after the department began investigating there wasn’t a lot of confidence Canada could do anything about the Volkswagen violations.

    He said if the government doesn’t act when there is a “violation of environmental law at this scale” and an admission of guilt in the United States regarding the same cars, it sends a horrible message.

    “It basically puts a mark on Canada as a place to get away with dumping your crap into the environment and nothing will be done about it,” said Gray.

    So on June the two agencies joined forces to apply for a ministerial investigation to be launched under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act.

    Provisions of that act allow a member of the public to seek a minister’s probe into allegations of violations of the act and to be updated on that investigation every 90 days.

    The application asked for investigations into four allegations including that Volkswagen imported cars that violated Canadian emissions requirements, applied the National Emissions Mark on diesel cars which didn’t meet the standards and then sold those cars, provided false and misleading information and earlier this year resumed sales of the 2015 models without fixing the emissions problem.

    Environment and Climate Change Canada’s Environmental Enforcement Directorate responded by saying because the department was already doing an in-house investigation on the first three items, there would be no ministerial probe.

    The department said it would launch a new investigation into the last claim, which looks at what Volkswagen did to fix its 2015 diesel-engine cars before starting to sell them again in Canada.

    This week the two organizations filed suit to force McKenna to comply with their application on all four issues.

    Amir Attaran, a lawyer with the Ecojustice environmental law clinic at the University of Ottawa who represents the individuals who filed the suit, said without launching investigations under Section 17 of the act, the government doesn’t have to update anyone on what it is doing to investigate.

    He said it has been nearly two years since the issue was first made public and Environment Canada launched its investigation. It has been almost six months since the company pleaded guilty in the U.S. and agreed that it wouldn’t deny wrongdoing in other countries as part of that plea. With all this, it doesn’t make sense that Canada hasn’t been able to complete its investigation and file charges here.

    Ontario NDP MP Brian Masse said Canada doesn’t take this kind of situation seriously enough and urged McKenna to act as soon as possible.

    Environment Canada spokesman Mark Johnson said in an email it is not abnormal for an investigation of this complexity to take two or three years and that work has to be completed to put together the strongest possible case before deciding whether to recommend charges be laid.


    0 0


    One-person households have usurped couples with children as the most common household type in Canada for the first time, data from the 2016 census found. These single-person residences make up almost 30 per cent of all households. The Star talked to some of Toronto’s solo-dwellers to find out the perks — like not having to fight over the last frozen pizza — and pitfalls — from spending more on rent to fighting pangs of loneliness.

    Name: Zackery Gibbison

    Age: 29

    Job: Plumbing

    Rent: $1,400

    Neighbourhood: Beaches

    Time spent living alone: Four years

    Reason for living alone: Self sustaining – I’m not worried about anyone moving out and putting that rent pressure on you.

    Would you change it?: At the moment I would say no, but if the right circumstance (like the right place, the right price or a long term girlfriend) came up, then yeah.

    Benefits: You can do what you like. You’re not worried about anybody else invading your space.

    Challenges: The amount of rent you’re paying for a one bedroom a month for one person is a little challenging and the upkeep with the apartment is a little more challenging.

    Name: Elizabeth Oloidi

    Age: 21

    Job: University student

    Rent: Free

    Neighbourhood: Don Mills

    Time spent living alone: A year

    Reason for living alone: I didn’t feel like living with anyone else anymore and my parents bought the condo, so I figured I’d just live there on my own enjoy my independence a little bit more.

    Would you change it?: I don’t think I could ever go back to living with roommates because I have so much freedom on my own. I think that living alone has taught me a lot more at a young age than I would have learned if I lived with other people.

    Benefits: If I come home at two in the morning after working all night I don’t bother anyone and no one bothers me. I know how much money I’m putting into the apartment is all for me, so I don’t have to worry about someone stealing my groceries or anything like that.

    Challenges: Cleaning is kind of annoying because I made the mess and no one else is going to clean it up for me. And just the usual fear like what if I left the oven on or the gas on and no one’s at home to turn it off or something.

    Name: Mollie Rolfe

    Age: 37

    Job: Freelance producer in the film industry

    Rent: $1,100 plus utilities

    Neighbourhood: Annex

    Time spent living alone: Seven years

    Reason for living alone: When I was around 30-years-old I was ready to live on my own. As nice as it is to save the money splitting bills and you can get a better place, I’d rather just have that space and have that space be as it is when I leave it, whether it’s good or bad.

    Would you change it? For a relationship I would or if I financially really needed it.

    Benefits: The freedom to do with your time and space whatever you please is a great bonus to living alone. Also as I’ve gotten older it’s nice to have that space to myself at the end of the day and not feel like I have to socialize if I don’t want to.

    Challenges: Definitely financially is probably one of the biggest challenges. I’m really lucky with the place I have now and how much I’m paying. And then honestly just loneliness, and that I think comes more from not being in a relationship. There are also the classic worries like what would happen if anything happened to me if I’m alone and no one noticed.

    Name: Beverley Quinn

    Age: 60s

    Job: Artist

    Rent: Owns home

    Neighbourhood: Beaches

    Time spent living alone: Since 2003

    Reason for living alone: I had a marriage and then I had a common law relationship and they both lasted 12 years and then in between I was on my own 12 years, so I do these 12 year cycles. I’m so happy in my own lifestyle and the things that I have going on in my life that I just prefer to have quiet time to my self and I’m fortunate to have a lot of friends both male and female that I can socialize with when I want to.

    Would you change it?: Happy as it is. Having good friends and a variety of interests are huge aspects of my enjoying the single experience.

    Benefits: It just allows me to set my own schedules. Also as an artist I need a lot of quiet time just to contemplate and be inspired for what I want to produce next so it’s just basically my own lifestyle which makes me happy to read or paint or listen to music.

    Challenges: Sometimes there’s no one to share dinner with when you feel like you need it, which is hardly a hardship because it’s not that often. Planning vacations: I know it’s easier when one has a partner…and as far as travel goes it’s hard to always find the right fit of the person you want to spend that much time with.

    Name: Karen Chau

    Age: 22

    Job: Social Media/Social Strategy Intern (Advertising)

    Rent: $800, all inclusive except for Internet

    Neighbourhood: Chinatown/Kensington

    Time spent living alone: Just over 2 years

    Reason for living alone: I needed to find a new place to live. My prospective roommates were slim to none and when I came across this bachelor apartment, I thought it would be a better option than living with random people.

    Would you change it?: If there were an opportunity to move in with a friend that I could get along with I would take it.

    Benefits: I can keep the space exactly how I want it. I don’t have to worry about inconveniencing a roommate or vice versa.

    Challenges: It can get lonely at times (probably the biggest challenge). There is no one to split up paying for Internet, so it is very expensive. Buying groceries is difficult for one person — things expire before you can finish them.

    These interviews have been condensed and edited for clarity.

    Read more at thestar.com:

    Canada has more same-sex couples, one-person households, census shows

    Canadians speaking more languages, census reveals

    Census reveals that young adults are living with their parents longer

    More Canadians than ever are living alone and without children, census finds

    Highlights from the 2016 census


    0 0


    SOMERSET WEST, SOUTH AFRICA—Oscar Pistorius was taken from prison to a hospital Thursday for medical examinations and will be kept at the facility overnight amid South African media reports that the former track star and convicted murderer was suffering from chest pains.

    Pistorius was taken to the hospital Thursday morning and was expected to return to the prison later the same day, Department of Corrections spokesperson Logan Maistry told The Associated Press. However, Pistorius will now stay overnight in the hospital “for observation,” Maistry said.

    Read more:

    Prosecutors to appeal Oscar Pistorius’ ‘shockingly too lenient’ jail sentence

    Oscar Pistorius sentenced to six years in prison

    Maistry declined to give details of Pistorius’ medical complaint, citing department rules preventing the divulging of information on offenders. He said only that Pistorius was having “medical examinations.”

    Reports claimed Pistorius was suffering from chest pains and was taken from Atteridgeville Prison to the emergency department at Kalafong Hospital in the South African capital Pretoria by ambulance, and escorted by armed guards.

    Maistry declined to comment on the reports, while a spokesperson for Pistorius didn’t immediately return a phone call from the The Associated Press seeking comment.

    Pistorius, the double-amputee Olympic runner and multiple Paralympic champion, is serving a six-year prison term for murder in the shooting death of girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp in 2013. He has served a year of his sentence.

    The 30-year-old Pistorius was first imprisoned at the Kgosi Mampuru II Prison in central Pretoria but was moved to Atteridgeville because it was better suited to handle disabled inmates.

    This is the second time Pistorius has left prison for a hospital visit. Last year, he was taken to the hospital for treatment to cuts on his wrists, which prison authorities said he sustained after falling in his cell.

    Pistorius was convicted of murder after an appeal by prosecutors against an initial manslaughter verdict. He killed Steenkamp in the early hours of Valentine’s Day 2013 by shooting her multiple times through a toilet cubicle door at his Pretoria home. Pistorius claimed he mistook his girlfriend for an intruder hiding in the cubicle.

    Prosecutors have announced their intention to appeal again, this time against Pistorius’ six-year sentence, which they say is too lenient. The National Prosecuting Authority said it will appeal to South Africa’s Supreme Court, and the appeal could be heard this year. Pistorius faces having his sentence increased to 15 years if prosecutors are successful. There is no death penalty in South Africa.


    0 0


    The next Ontario election is 44 weeks away, but political games are already at a fever pitch.

    This week, the Liberals filed a formal complaint with Elections Ontario claiming both the Progressive Conservatives and the New Democrats have broken the province’s tough new fundraising law.

    But the governing party’s allegations against their main rivals do not seem to hold water.

    On Wednesday, David Clarke, the Liberals’ executive director, complained in writing to Chief Electoral Officer Greg Essensa that the Tories and New Democrats are flouting the restrictions triggered by a Star probe last year.

    “I am concerned about multiple apparent contraventions of the Election Finances Act . . . by at least 14 nominated candidates from the . . . PC Party and further apparent contraventions of the law by two (NDP MPPs),” wrote Clarke.

    “I ask that you fully investigate these allegations.”

    The Liberals claim a $500-a-plate July 27 dinner at One King West attended by 14 nominated Tory candidates violated a ban on politicians going to such fundraisers.

    In fact, Elections Ontario assured the Tories on June 26 that nominated candidates “can attend a fundraising event between the end of their nomination meeting and the day the writ is dropped.”

    The independent overseer of provincial campaigns confirmed that to the Star on Thursday.

    “Under the Election Finances Act . . . the effective date of registration is deemed to be the date of issue of the writ. We have provided this information to all political parties,” said Election Ontario’s Cara Des Granges.

    With the next election set for June 7, 2018, that means the campaign does not officially begin until May 9.

    In their letter to Essensa, the Liberals also alleged that the New Democrats broke the law at a separate event on July 18 in Niagara Falls.

    They believe that raising $20,175 at MPP Wayne Gates’ nomination meeting was illegal because both Gates and NDP deputy leader Jagmeet Singh were in attendance.

    However, an Elections Ontario bulletin issued to the parties this summer specifically spelled out a list of where attendance restrictions “do not apply.”

    These include to fundraisers where “the attendees pay no fee or charge to gain entry to meet a party leader or MPP, but have the option of making contributions by bidding in a silent auction at the event . . . (or at) an annual general meeting where no contribution is embedded in the entry fee.”

    Rick Dykstra, president of the Progressive Conservative party, expressed astonishment that the Liberals do not appear to grasp a law they crafted and passed.

    “Several months ago, the PC party did its due diligence to read the law, confirm with Elections Ontario what the law means, and fully abide by it,” said Dykstra.

    “It would appear by this complaint that the Ontario Liberal Party has not read, or is unable to understand, the law they wrote,” he said.

    “But the Liberal party’s ignorance to the law should come as no surprise given their own very serious legal problems.”

    That’s a reference to two trials of former Liberal aides that begin next month in Toronto and Sudbury.

    The New Democrats also blasted the Grits for wasting Elections Ontario’s resources by calling for investigations into petty grievances.

    “Ontario families would be better served if Kathleen Wynne and the Liberal party spent less time making frivolous complaints and more time addressing the needs of Ontarians,” said Karla Webber-Gallagher, the NDP provincial secretary.

    Webber-Gallagher emphasized that the New Democrats “are confident that all rules were respected.”

    Wynne moved to reform Ontario’s lax fundraising rules after the Star revealed in March 2016 that Liberal cabinet ministers had secret annual party targets of up to $500,000 apiece.

    Under the changes, which took effect on Jan. 1, corporate and union donations are banned, MPPs and registered candidates cannot attend fundraisers, and the individual contribution limit has dropped to $1,200.

    To offset the lost donation revenue, parties receive yearly $2.71-per-vote public subsidies based on the results of the 2014 election.

    The Liberals, with 1,863,974 votes, receive $5.06 million annually; the Tories, with 1,508,811 votes, $4.09 million; the NDP, with 1,144,822 votes, $3.1 million; and the Greens, with 232,536 votes, $630,000.


older | 1 | .... | 990 | 991 | (Page 992) | 993 | 994 | .... | 1060 | newer